Legal Opinion

Sissel v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1978No. 33961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

The plaintiffs-appellants brought suit against the defendants-appellees to enjoin defendant Dáñese B. Smith from converting the interior of her carport into a beauty shop. The parties are all residents of Unit I of Chimney Hills Subdivision, located in Gwinnett County. The plaintiffs argue that operation of a beauty shop in the defendants’ carport violates the following restrictive covenants to which the parties’ lots are subject: Restrictive Covenant 1. "Lots shown shall be for single family residence purposes only.” Restrictive Covenant 4. "No building shall be erected on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shoaf v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Jordan v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Olson v. JantauschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Varney v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  5. Vaccaro v. RougeouCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Barry-Lawrence County Ass'n for Retarded CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Knudtson v. TrainorNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
  5. Greenbrier-Cloverdale Homeowners Ass'n v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API