Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Keto
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 26, 2013No. 12-P-770PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.
The central issue in this case is the correct interpretation of the college expenses provision of a marital separation agreement (agreement) incorporated into a California divorce judgment. We must also resolve choice of law issues, as the California divorce judgment was registered in Massachusetts pursuant to G. L. c. 209D, § 6-601. The defendant, Eric Keto (father), contends that he is not obligated to pay his share of the college expenses because they were not “agreed upon” as provided in the judgment. The plaintiff, Lisette Cooper (mother), contends that the father was properly held in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bielkus v. StrydomMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Franchi v. FranchiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Leeden v. DoellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Weeks v. Palmer Motorsports Park, LLCMassachusetts Land Court · 2021