Dyke v. Scopetti
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Robinson, J.
This case involves a father’s obligation to pay college tuition for his daughters pursuant to a Pennsylvania child-support order. Father appeals the trial-court order requiring him to pay specified college-tuition costs for his two daughters. We affirm.
¶2. The underlying facts are not in substantial dispute. The parties, father Frank A. Scopetti, Jr., and mother Kimberley Marie Scopetti, were married in Pennsylvania and had two daughters. They entered into a separation agreement on July 30, 1998, when their elder daughter, Indie, was six years old, and their younger daughter,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kripp v. KrippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Best v. BestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dyke v. ScopettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Edward F. Flanagan v. Nancy duMont (Flanagan)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Edward F. Flanagan v. Nancy duMont (Flanagan)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Mooers v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2022