Legal Opinion

United States v. Cameron

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 30, 2009No. CR-09-24-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant James Cameron’s Motion for Discovery and grants in part and denies in part Mr. Cameron’s Motion for Additional Discovery.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On February 11, 2009, a federal grand jury indicted James Cameron for transporting, receiving, and possessing child pornography in violation of federal criminal law. Indictment (Docket #3); 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(l), 2252A(a)(2), 2252A(a)(5)(B). On May 7, 2009, Mr. Cameron moved for discovery. Mot. for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Amaya-ManzanaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. O'RourkeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  3. United States v. PoulinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RigmaidenDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  2. State v. GRENNINGWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. GrenningWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. United States v. HealeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API