State v. Grenning

¶19 (dissenting) —The majority’s mistakes of fact and law lead to the wrong conclusions and the wrong result in this case. Contrary to the majority’s assertion that the defense expert refused to examine the defendant’s computer under the trial court’s discovery and protective orders, nothing in the record supports the claim that the defendant’s expert refused to work under the court’s protective order.

¶20 As to the law, the majority misapplies our precedent and erroneously reaches the conclusion that the State must *62turn over to the defendant mirror images of his hard drives in order to comply…