United States v. Healey
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 22, 2011, a jury found Mark Healey guilty of transporting, distributing, and possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. On November 4, 2011 he moved for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that “the cumulative impact of the Government’s multiple discovery violations was so serious a detriment to the defense’s preparation for trial and the construction of a defense strategy as to deny Mr. Healey due process and a fundamentally fair trial.”1 Healey also argues…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A "E. Robert (Bob) Wallach," and Wayne Franklyn ChinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gaetano ModicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.