Legal Opinion

United States v. Healey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 24, 2012No. 11 Cr. 132 (SAS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

On September 22, 2011, a jury found Mark Healey guilty of transporting, distributing, and possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. On November 4, 2011 he moved for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that “the cumulative impact of the Government’s multiple discovery violations was so serious a detriment to the defense’s preparation for trial and the construction of a defense strategy as to deny Mr. Healey due process and a fundamentally fair trial.”1 Healey also argues…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A "E. Robert (Bob) Wallach," and Wayne Franklyn ChinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Gaetano ModicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API