Barry v. Cronin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
There are three counts in the declaration, all in contract for the same cause of action, the plaintiff seeking to recover money paid to the defendant on account of the purchase of a taxicab by reason of alleged breach of an express warranty made by the defendant. The answer was a general denial and plea of payment. The plaintiff testified that after an earlier conference, he met the defendant in the latter part of March, 1927, and decided to purchase the taxicab, and the defendant said: “I will guarantee to you that this car I will get you will be in perfect condition, and I also will…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Sullivan v. RocheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Tripp v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Raymond Syndicate, Inc. v. American Radio & Research Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Denenberg v. JuradMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Ryder & Brown Co. v. E. Lissberger Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Fairbanks v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
- Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Cannon v. Page & Baker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933