Legal Opinion

Denenberg v. Jurad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 14, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

On December 28, 1932, the plaintiffs signed a written agreement to buy a truck, model G 31, from the defendant, a dealer, for $938.57. One provision was as follows: “It is agreed that said car has not been represented to me as a model of any particular year, it being clear to me that the cars are sold by model and not by calendar year of manufacture.” Another provision was: “If this car is to be delivered on your deferred payment plan, I am to execute your standard form of contract of conditional sale before delivery.”

On January 11, 1933, the contract of conditional sale was signed. In it the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Rathgeber v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. O'Shea v. VaughnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Gottman v. Jeffrey-Nichols Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. Builders' Equipment & Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Jurewicz v. JurewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Carolet Corp. v. GarfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Babcock Coal Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API