Brent Quade v. Arizona Board of Regents
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*624MEMORANDUM *
Brent Quade appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. Quade sued the Arizona Board of Regents (the governing board of Arizona State University) and four individuals associated with ASU, alleging a violation of due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, gender discrimination under Title IX, defamation, false light invasion' of privacy, violation of the right of privacy under the Arizona Constitution, and interference with prospective employment. The district court dismissed all claims against the Board and the university…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Douglas Miller v. County of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Plaine v. McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mark Eilrich v. Bernard J. RemasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bullock v. Arizona Board of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Do v. Arizona State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- McShane v. Department of Parks and Recreation, City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Monteleone v. University of Arizona Dean of Student's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021