Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Motor Carriers Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The Commission ordered the inquiry entirely, on its own motion, without any complaint that rates in effect were unfair, unjust, discriminatory, or should be changed. The respondents and interveners, therefore, argue the Commission was without authority to wipe out the rates and tariffs filed by the carriers, approved by the Commission, and accepted by the shippers and all customers after all parties for years had geared their operations, made their investments, relying on those rates. Apparently Judge Mintz was impressed by the logic of the argument.

*439Whether, under the circumstances here…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Hines v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Lumber Co. v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Bird Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API