Legal Opinion

State v. Rojas-Cardona

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 1993No. 92-713PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

This criminal appeal presents us with two issues concerning Iowa’s theft by check statute. See Iowa Code §§ 714.1(6), 714.2(2) (1991). First, if a payee agrees to accept a postdated check, is the payee deceived because the payee was unaware the account was closed at the time the check was written? Second, where such a check is given for property or services, must the check be given immediately upon completion of the services or delivery of the property? A jury convicted the defendant of violating section 714.1(6). On appeal the defendant challenges the district court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SchrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. State v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. State v. HogrefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995
  4. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
  5. State of Iowa v. Kamie Jo SchieboutSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API