Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Ranney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Frazer, J. Bill by James E. Kimball against Frederick T. Eanney and George W. Balch for an accounting and an injunction. From a decree against defendant Eanney alone, both he and complainant appeal. . Eanney was disqualified to purchase in his own name while acting as agent for Kimball. 2 Sug. Vend. & P. (8th Amer. Ed.) 406; 2 Pom. Eq. Jur. §§ 959, 1052; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 316; Adams, Eq. 61, and cases cited; Greenh. Pub.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Wayne; Frazer, J. Bill by James E. Kimball against Frederick T. Eanney and George W. Balch for an accounting and an injunction. From a decree against defendant Eanney alone, both he and complainant appeal. . Eanney was disqualified to purchase in his own name while acting as agent for Kimball. 2 Sug. Vend. & P. (8th Amer. Ed.) 406; 2 Pom. Eq. Jur. §§ 959, 1052; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 316; Adams, Eq. 61, and cases cited; Greenh. Pub. Pol. 300; Ingerson v. Starkweather, Walk. Oh. 346; Walton v. Torrey, Har. Oh. 259; Clute v. Barron, 2 Mich. 192; People y. Township Board, 11 Mich. 226;…

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Heath owned certain real estate in the city of Detroit, upon which were two mortgages, aggregating about $17,000. Ranney, a real-estate agent, was employed by Heath to sell the property, for which he was to receive a commission. There was talk between them that the value of the property would be increased if the council of the city could be induced to fix the location of a proposed street upon this property. Heath became pecuniarily involved, and on June 16, 1893, deeded the property to his father-in-law, Kimball. Kimball testified *163that the consideration for this deed was $1, and that he paid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Grumley v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Newcomb v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  5. Martin v. WyncoopIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Northup v. BathrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Pikes Peak Co. v. PfuntnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Backus v. CowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Williams v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API