Legal Opinion

Martin v. Wyncoop

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1859PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Daniel B. Fatout filed his bill in chancery (under the old practice) against the heirs of Austin W. Morris, the heirs of Eben Pierce, deceased, and the appellant, Martin, to remove a cloud from the title to certain lands which Morris had, in his lifetime, sold to Fatout. The heirs of Pierce (Wyncoop et al.) filed a counterclaim or cross-bill against all the other parties, and set up a claim to a tract of land which Morris had sold to Martin. The heirs of Pierce allege that the sale of the land by Morris to Martin was in violation of the trust reposed in Morris, as administrator of the estate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brackenridge v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Valentine v. WysorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hunsucker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Matter of Estate of GarwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API