Steinhart v. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action to recover the sum of $860, money alleged to have been received by the defendant to and for the use of the plaintiffs. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, from which, and from an order refusing a new trial, the plaintiffs appeal.
*364The facts of the case, as found by the court, are as follows: —
On the seventeenth day of December, 1888, one G. Politz made his promissory note to the plaintiffs for $860, payable two months after date at the bank of defendant. They delivered it to the London, Paris, and American Bank of San Francisco for collection, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griffith v. GroganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- National Gold Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Welch v. AllingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Brown v. OlmstedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Bank of California v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Security Nat. Bank of Sioux City v. Old Nat. Bank of Battle CreekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Pacific National Agricultural Credit Corp. v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Inter-state National Bank v. RingoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.