Legal Opinion

Daniel H. Talbot, Plff. In Err. v. Sioux National Bank of Sioux City, Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 14, 1902No. 190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

185 U.S. 182

22 S.Ct. 621

46 L.Ed. 862

DANIEL H. TALBOT, Plff. in Err.,

v.

SIOUX NATIONAL BANK OF SIOUX CITY, IOWA.

No. 190.

Argued March 17, 18, 1902.

Decided April 14, 1902.

This is an action brought in the district court of Woodbury county, Iowa, under §§ 5197 and 5198 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, relating to national banks, to recover the sum of $16,250, the amount of interest alleged to have been unlawfully charged and collected by the defendant bank.

The original petition alleged as follows:

'The plaintiff claims of the defendants, and each of them, the sum of $16,000, as money…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · McKenna.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Talbot v. Sioux National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Talbot v. Sioux National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Everett A. R. Searl, Pearl A. Searl v. Donald M. EarllCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. LangstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Co. v. MooreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Company v. MooreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API