Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 23, 1985No. 83-572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lindberg

Defendant, Charles Anderson, appeals from his conviction in the circuit court of Du Page County after a jury trial on two counts of obscenity in violation of section 11—20 of the Illinois Criminal Code of 1961. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 11—20.) Defendant contends that the two magazines sold by his employee were not obscene as a matter of law beyond a reasonable doubt, that the State failed to prove defendant possessed the requisite scienter for his obscenity conviction, and that the trial court erroneously interpreted the law, thereby necessitating remandment for resentencing.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Ward v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HarroldNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. PatroffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. McGeorgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API