Legal Opinion
State v. Harrold
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1999No. S-97-1167PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
I. NATURE OF CASE
Scott A. Harrold was, pursuant to jury verdict, adjudged guilty in the Lancaster County Court of producing or distributing obscene material, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-813(1) (Reissue 1995), and the county court fined Harrold $1,000. On appeal, the district court affirmed the conviction and fine, but the Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and dismissed the case, based on its determination that the material produced and distributed by Harrold was not obscene and was consequently protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See State v.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. IromuanyaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GalindoNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.