Legal Opinion

People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 1986No. 85-0504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Defendant, Sequoia Books, Inc., was charged in an amended information with 10 counts of obscenity (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 11 — 20(a)(1)) involving the sale of certain magazines seized during a search pursuant to a warrant. Following a mistrial after the jury was unable to reach a verdict, defendant was then tried in a jury trial on only three counts and was found guilty of all three counts of obscenity. Defendant was fined $910.

Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the procedures utilized in obtaining and executing the search warrant were constitutionally…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Village of Deerfield v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. People v. WadeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API