Legal Opinion
Clinton B. Howard v. United States of America, Domenic N. Mastrippolito v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1968No. 22349, 22349-APublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
Each of the above named appellants was charged with federal gambling tax offenses in a single two-count indictment. In count I Mastrippolito was charged with engaging in the business of accepting wages without paying, and attempting to evade, the occupational wagering tax imposed by section 4411 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, in violation of section 7201 of that Code. In the same count I, Howard was charged with aiding and abetting Mastrippolito in the commission of that offense. In count II, Howard was charged with the identical substantive violation and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Phillip Andrew ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- United States v. Charles Spencer, A/K/A JesseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Roy WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Uless Grant MansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.