Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. 88-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 4123.59(B) provides for death benefits to specified relatives of a decedent worker. Its pertinent provisions are:

“In case an injury to or an occupational disease contracted by an em*202ployee causes his death, benefits shall be in the amount and to the persons following:

* *

“(B) If there are wholly dependent persons at the time of the death, the weekly payment shall be sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wage, but not to exceed a maximum aggregate amount of weekly compensation which is equal to sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the statewide average weekly wage as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. CordrayOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Daugherty v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API