Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1988No. 88-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
R.C. 4123.59(B) provides for death benefits to specified relatives of a decedent worker. Its pertinent provisions are:
“In case an injury to or an occupational disease contracted by an em*202ployee causes his death, benefits shall be in the amount and to the persons following:
* *
“(B) If there are wholly dependent persons at the time of the death, the weekly payment shall be sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wage, but not to exceed a maximum aggregate amount of weekly compensation which is equal to sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the statewide average weekly wage as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. CordrayOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Daugherty v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.