Legal Opinion

Glancey v. COM. STATE EMP. RET. BD.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1992No. 146 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*483OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether judges removed from office for disciplinary reasons, pursuant to Article V, Section 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, automatically forfeit their pension benefits by virtue of Article V, Section 16(b).

For the reasons set out as follows, we conclude that neither the history nor the language of the Constitution support a conclusion that Article V, Section 16(b) is meant to create a broad pension forfeiture provision.

Procedural History

Involved in this appeal are four individual Petitioners whose cases have been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Wright v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Catania v. COM., STATE EMP. RETIREMENTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. McKenna v. State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Larsen v. Senate Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Shiomos v. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT BD.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Braig v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. G.A. and D.D. Sandusky v. PA State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API