Legal Opinion

Mann v. Powell

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 5, 1969No. 69 C 2235PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before SWYGERT, Circuit Judge, and PARSONS and DECKER, District Judges. PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Robert E. Mann and Bernard Weisberg, ask us to declare Illinois *678Public Act 76-1964 unconstitutional and to enjoin Paul Powell, Secretary of State, and the other named defendants, ex officio members of the Electoral Board of the State of Illinois, from engaging in certain unconstitutional acts pursuant thereto. The jurisdiction of this court is properly invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202.

Mann, a member of the Illinois House of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Bernard Weisberg v. Paul Powell, Individually and as Secretary of State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tyler Crews, B/n/f Borden Crews, His Father v. Eugene Cloncs, Individually and as Principal of North Central High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  2. Nancy Carola Jacobsen v. Florida Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Brian Mecinas v. Katie HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Mann v. PowellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  5. Tsongas v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API