Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Roy Dan Jackson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1982No. 82-5450PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Court not having favored rehearing en banc in the above case, 688 F.2d 1068 (6th Cir.1982), the petition for rehearing is referred to our panel for disposition.
On rehearing appellant argues that he was not given the opportunity to prove that more information was revealed than that discussed in our opinion in this case. We see no need to grant rehearing on this issue since we agree with the District Court’s conclusion that Jackson did not have “just cause” to refuse to testify before the grand jury, even assuming misconduct on the part of these government officials under 26 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Mario Adamo, Richard Marsico, Terry Freeman, Raymond Ripley, Jeffrey Linkous, Ectore Garcia, and Winthrop HongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- First Western Government Securities, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Ryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lawrence M. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mid-South Music Corp. v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.