Alliance of Artists & Recording Companies v. General Motors Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge
The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (“AHRA”), 17 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., re*9quires manufacturers, importers, and dis-tributers of “digital audio recording devices” (“DARDs”) to incorporate certain copying control technology into their devices and pay a set royalty amount for each device. The AHRA is part of federal copyright law, and a non-profit organization called the Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies (“AARC”) assists the U.S. Copyright Office in enforcing the AHRA’s provisions by, among other things, collecting…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Alliance of Artists & Recording Cos. v. Gen. Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Edgar County Watchdogs v. Joliet TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
- Alliance of Artists & Recording Cos. v. Gen. Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies, Inc. v. Denso International AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.