Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Clinton Machine Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1957No. Nos. 15725, 15729Published

1ConcurrenceSanborn, Circuit Judge

(concurring) .

The engine disclosed by the patent to Lechtenberg, who was a development engineer employed by Briggs & Stratton Corporation, resulted from his being assigned the problem of producing the best four-cycle air-cooled die-cast aluminum gasoline engine that he was capable of making. The cast iron Briggs & Stratton engine which was then being made, and which was largely supplanted later by the Lechtenberg engine, was good, but weighed 36 pounds and sold to manufacturers for $30.45. The engine which Lechtenberg developed and patented weighed 19% pounds and sold for $21.25. It could be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API