Schumacher v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Wright county in favor of plaintiffs, entered pursuant to the order ■of Giddings, J.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
This was a proceeding in equity to declare ditch proceedings under chapter 258, p. 413, Raws 1901, as amended by chapter 38, p. '90, Raws 1902, void, and to restrain the county auditor from filing any paper therein and from extending any tax on the tax rolls in •connection therewith.
The trial court granted the injunction. This was error. The party complaining had an adequate remedy at law. There was not a sufficient occasion for equitable interference. In Albrecht v. City of St. Paul, 47 Minn. 531, 50 N. W. 609, of a similar application in proceedings to prevent the enforcement of a local…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- McMillan v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Beise v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Albrecht v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Fajder v. Village of AitkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Wall v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Bilsborrow v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Jacobson v. County of Lac Qui ParleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Slingerland v. ConnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.