Legal Opinion
Hall v. Continental Drilling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1957No. 16600PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant’s decedent was an employee of the Lane-Wells Company who on the date of the accident was working as a perforator operator on an oil well owned and operated by appellee. The California Company, pursuant to a contract for such services between Lane-Wells and California. At that time employees and equipment of appellee Continental Drilling Company were also located at and working on the same rig pursuant to a separate contract between Continental and California whereby the former was to “rework” the well. Early in the morning of February 11, 1954, some…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Philps v. Guy Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gorsalitz v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Jack J. Bruce v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Frank Maddox v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Bethlehem Steel Company v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.