Legal Opinion

Tyrrell v. Caruso

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. There was ample evidence of injury to the plaintiff. There was testimony tending to show that the plaintiff, walking on Main Street in the Charlestown district of Boston and desiring to cross that street to the corner of Miller Street, proceeded part way across Main Street and waited underneath the elevated structure five or ten minutes while a large number of automobiles passed. She then looked up and down Main Street, and, as there was no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Gauthier v. QuickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Puccia v. SevigneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Quinn v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hannon v. Hayes-Bickford Lunch System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Legg v. BloomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API