Legal Opinion
Gauthier v. Quick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 24, 1924PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The plaintiff, while walking across Main Street in Springfield in the middle of the day, was struck and injured by the automobile of the defendant, in which the defendant was riding and which was being driven at his request, on his business, by one Charles M. Lane. This is an action of tort to recover damages for injuries thus caused.
When the action was begun both Quick and Lane were named as defendants, but before trial a discontinuance was entered as to Lane. The only question raised in the case is, whether the presiding judge was right in refusing to allow the defendant’s motion for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Kaminski v. FournierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- McCrohan v. DavisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Lynch v. Fisk Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Buoniconti v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hennessey v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Boni v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Mulroy v. MarinakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Clark v. C. E. Fay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Hutchinson v. H. E. Shaw Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.