Legal Opinion
Wedgwood Homes, Inc. v. Lund
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1983No. TC 40-069, CA A20839, SC 28880PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This case presents for our consideration the extent of protection of trademarks and names provided by ORS 647.107, Oregon’s antidilution statute. The statute provides:
“Likelihood of injury to business reputation or of dilution of the distinctive quality of a mark registered under ORS 647.015, or a mark valid at common law, or a trade name valid at common law, shall be a ground for injunctive relief notwithstanding the absence of competition between the parties or the absence of confusion as to the source of goods or services.”
Plaintiff, Wedgwood Homes of Portland, Inc., and its wholly owned…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Tiffany & Co. v. Boston Club, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1964
- Filter Dynamics International, Inc. v. Astron Battery, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Volt Services Group v. Adecco Employment Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Moore Push-Pin Co. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. v. Epix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Arthur Young, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
- Mueller v. US Pipe & FoundryDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.