Legal Opinion

Wright v. Mack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884No. 11,110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this case the appellants, the plaintiffs be*333low, have assigned here as errors the following decisions of the circuit court:

1. In sustaining the demurrers of the appellees, except Eva Mack, to the complaint of the appellants; and,

2. In overruling their motion to default the appellee Eva Mack.’

In their complaint the appellants alleged the following-facts :

“1st. That on the 14th day of November, 1882, the defendant Michael K. Weaver, being a merchant engaged in the drug business at the city of Elkhart, in said county, and being in failing circumstances, made an assignment in due form, .under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strong v. Taylor School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Robbins v. Sand Creek Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Gaskill v. AldrichIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Murphy v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hutchinson v. First National Bank of Michigan CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Voorhees v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Pierce v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Fidelity National Bank v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API