Pierce v. Pierce
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Campbell, Metson, Drew, Oatman & MacKenzie, Power & McFadzean, E. M. Rea, and Horatio Ailing, for Appellant,
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] For a statement of the facts and of the grounds of the decision as to the merits, we make the following quotation from the opinion filed in the cause by the learned trial judge: "This is a suit between the present wife and the former wife of Dr. Robert E. Pierce to quiet title to an orange grove of about thirty acres near Lindsay, and now worth at least $30,000. By a cross-complaint Dr. Pierce, his mother, Fannie L. Pierce, and his brother, Frederick B. Pierce,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Drury v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Livesay's Ex'r v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Morris v. . TuthillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Toler v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Vanguard Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Isaacson v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Isaacson v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930