Marshall Field & Co. v. Sutherland
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court.— Hon. W. H. McHenry, Judge. Suit on a written'guaranty. Trial to the court on an agreed statement of facts, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
The facts necessary to an understanding of the controversy in this ease as gathered from the statements of counsel are as follows: The Pattee-Sutherland Company was a corporation engaged in business in the city of Des Moines, and, wishing to purchase goods on credit from *219Marshall Field & Co., and not being able to do so without a guaranty, arrangements were made whereby the defendant D. W. Sutherland executed his written guaranty, which was accepted and acted upon by Marshall Field & Co. During the time that the guaranty was in force, a part of a consignment of goods which had been purchased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Herron v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Chambers v. CochranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Bullis v. NobleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- State National Bank v. FlathersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Monona County v. GraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Reints v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. HuestisSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1919