Legal Opinion

John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Huestis

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 1, 1919No. 42702Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

DORAN, J.

I find that plaintiff and the Pilgrim Shoe Machinery Company made a contract by which plaintiff was to sell or make and sell to said Pilgrim Shoe Machinery Company certain wire;

That defendants signed and delivered a guaranty that goods sold by plaintiff to said Pilgrim Shoe Machinery Company would be paid for;

That from said guaranty was stricken *41the words ‘jointly and severally”, applying to defendant’s act in guaranteeing;

For plaintiff: E. C. Stiness, D. H. Morrissey. For defendants: Waterman & Greenlaw, Brand & Halford.

That plaintiff sent letters which came to defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. . SaxtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Bridge v. Carter, GuardianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Hoffmann v. MayaudCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  4. Marshall Field & Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Kamber v. RosenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API