Whiting, McKenna & Co. v. Root
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clarhe District Court. These actions were commenced at law, but upon the filing of amended petitions were transferred to the- chancery side of the court. The causes were sent to a referee and judgment for the plaintiff rendered upon his report. Defendant appeals. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Ch. J.
The cases were presented together upon substantially the same abstracts and arguments..
Tbe petition of plaintiffs, in tbe first case, alleges that Mintonye & Lee executed to them two promissory notes, each for the sum of $760, for goods to supply a store which they were *293Peeping. Mintonye owned most of tbe capital invested in the business and a valuable storehouse and lot upon which it was situated, which were occupied by the firm. They were largely 'indebted and desirious of making such a disposition of their property as would .secure the payment of their debts. In pursuance, of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Orman v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farrell v. Forest Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Vincent v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Green Bay Lumber Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Munier v. ZacharySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Love Banks Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.