Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. Geo. W. Wakeeield, Judge. Mandamus to compel the defendant, who is county auditor of Monona county, to award to plaintiff a contract for the construction of a ditch. Demurrer to petition being sustained,’ and plaintiff electing to stand upon his pleading without further amendment, there was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.- —

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J.- —

-The petition alleges that by proper proceedings under chapter 2, title 10, of the Code, a public ditch was located through lands in Monona county; that, for convenience in letting the work of excavation, the ditch was divided into 20 sections; that defendant, as county auditor, gave due notice of the letting of said work in separate sections as provided by law; that plaintiff became a bidder for such work upon each and every section at prices varying *611from 6.7 cents to 10 cents per cubic yard; that the Canal Construction Company was also a bidder upon all of said sections at the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Marcum v. Ballot Com'rsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People Ex Rel. Belden v. Contracting BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Anderson v. Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Hager v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Holt v. DotySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API