Legal Opinion

Cobank, Acb v. Reorganized Farmers Cooperative Ass'n

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 9, 2004No. 02-1300-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARTEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff CoBank’s motion for summary judgment on defendant Farmers Cooperative Association’s amended counterclaims. For the reasons stated below, the court grants plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to all counterclaims. The court finds the material facts as follows.

I. STANDARD

Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. UMB Bank, N.A. v. MonsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API