Legal Opinion

Brough v. Mighell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the district court of the third district granting a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Anderson, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the third district court granting a new trial. The order was made and entered on the eighth day of July, 1889. On the sixteenth day of July, 1889, the plaintiff was granted, by consent of parties, “thirty days’ additional time within which to file and serve a bill of exceptions and statement on appeal, and notice of appeal; and proceedings in the case are in the meantime stayed.” On the fifteenth day of August following, on motion of plaintiff and by consent of parties, the court granted plaintiff fifteen days’ additional time; and on the 28th…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Halthusen Mercantile Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Minneapolis Threshing Mach. Co. v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ryan & Ream Cattle Co. v. MurdockUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Watson v. MayberryUtah Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API