Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Threshing Mach. Co. v. Fox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1918No. 3149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Salt Late County, Third District; Son. F. G. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company against Jesse W. Fox and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment entered against them by the district court of Salt Lake County. The *102plaintiff bas interposed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is based on several grounds, but for the reasons hereinafter appearing, we shall consider the first ground only, namely, that the appeal was not taken within the time required by our statute, and for that reason this court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

The record filed in this court shows that the judgment against the defendants was duly entered on January 15, 1916, and that notice of the entry of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Felt v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Anderson v. Halthusen Mercantile Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Brough v. MighellUtah Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lund v. Third Judicial Dist. Court in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Jenkins v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Times Printing & Publishing Co. v. BabcockIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ogden v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Petersen v. Ohio Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API