Ryan & Ream Cattle Co. v. Murdock
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment and from an order refusing a new trial of tbe district court of the second district. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Minee, J.:
The record in this case shows that judgment was entered in favor of the defendants September 12, 1890, and on December 8, 1890,’ the plaintiff filed and served its notice of intention to move for a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the findings and. decision. On February 9, 1892, notice of appeal from the judgment and order denying a new trial was filed and *498entered. The notice of intention to move for a new trial was not filed or served within the time required by § 3402, Comp. Laws 1888,’ nor was the time for such service extended by the court. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fairchild v. DatenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Brough v. MighellUtah Supreme Court · 1890
- Childs v. KincaidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Palmdale Irrigation District v. RathkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. Halthusen Mercantile Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
- Voorhees v. Manti CityUtah Supreme Court · 1896