Legal Opinion

State v. Sommerville

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1988No. 53040-8PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dore, J. —

We hold that a court considering a motion for acquittal by reason of insanity under RCW 10.77.080 should analyze the merits of the question and determine whether the defendant has proved insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. The court must do more than merely determine whether a jury question is presented. In addition, we hold that a defendant acquitted of murder by reason of insanity and convicted of the rape of a separate victim should be committed to the custody of the Department of Social and Health Services and should serve his prison time on his rape conviction only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Queets Band of Indians v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re the Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API