State v. Sommerville
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dore, J. —
We hold that a court considering a motion for acquittal by reason of insanity under RCW 10.77.080 should analyze the merits of the question and determine whether the defendant has proved insanity by a preponderance of the evidence. The court must do more than merely determine whether a jury question is presented. In addition, we hold that a defendant acquitted of murder by reason of insanity and convicted of the rape of a separate victim should be committed to the custody of the Department of Social and Health Services and should serve his prison time on his rape conviction only…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Queets Band of Indians v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Detention of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.