North Sea Products, Ltd. v. Clipper Seafoods Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This case presents the question of whether the immunity from suit traditionally possessed by federally recognized Indian tribes includes immunity from garnishment actions. Also included is the issue of whether tribal immunity against garnishment is waived when a tribe conducts a commercial enterprise outside the boundaries of the reservation.
We hold that tribal immunity includes immunity from garnishment actions, and that this immunity has not been waived by the tribe's commercial activities. In these respects, we reverse the trial court, which held to the contrary.
The procedural history of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sac & Fox Nation v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bour v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Richard D. Greene and Donna J. Greene, Husband and Wife, Debtors, Ross Richardson, Chapter 7, Trustee-Appellee v. Mt. Adams FurnitureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian NationWashington Supreme Court · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.