Legal Opinion

In re Martin K.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 30, 1999No. AC 18917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*11 Opinion

2Per curiam

The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her son. The sole issue is whether the court had clear- and convincing evidence to support its decision to terminate the parental rights of the respondent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On appeal, the respondent asks this court to review the trial court’s findings of fact. It is well established that an appellate court cannot retry the facts. Our review is limited to determining whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northeast Parking, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Wieler v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petronella v. Venture Partners, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. In re Felicia B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Santangelo v. Elite Beverage, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. In re Christopher L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API