Legal Opinion
In re Felicia B.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 1, 2000No. AC 19122PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The intervenor appellants, the respondent father’s parents and sister, appeal from the judgments of the trial court terminating the respondents’ *526parental rights. The intervenor appellants challenge the denial of their motion for custody or visitation issued incidental to the dispositional phase of the proceedings.1 They claim that the trial court improperly (1) precluded them from calling as witnesses supervisors in the department of children and families, (2) based its decision on facts not in evidence and (3) denied them their rights to due process. We disagree.
At a dispositional…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Martin K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
4Cited by6 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ParnoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Gabriel v. Kniffen, No. Fa-98-0067326s (Jan. 30, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- In Re Melina R., (May 31, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- In re Felicia B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lawson v. Lawson, No. Cv99-008 07 80 S (Sep. 13, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.