Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Milestone

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1980No. 79-2782PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

One count of a federal indictment charged bribery to affect the acts of two officials, but at pretrial, the prosecution elected to prove conduct only as to one. The trial court permitted an alteration of the indictment to that effect. We conclude that the modification did not constitute an amendment to the indictment requiring grand jury approval. Accordingly, we reject the petitioner’s contention to the contrary and affirm a district court judgment denying a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner sought postconviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. William C. Kelly, III v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Mark Wellington, United States of America v. Jerome C. UtzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Russell McLaughlin Jr., in No. 96-1982. United States of America v. Mark McLaughlin in No. 96-2000Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API