Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 1, 1989No. 05-88-01264-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals a conviction for aggravated robbery. Enhanced by one prior conviction, the jury assessed punishment at seventy-five years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $10,000.00. In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting into evidence a pen packet not properly authenticated under Rule 902 of the Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

We begin by quoting the governing provisions of rule 902:

Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KlasingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Ex Parte BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Williams v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API