Williams v. Bi-State Development Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Presiding Judge.
Bus passenger appeals summary judgment granted in bus company’s favor. He raises two points of error. Both allege summary judgment was not proper based on the existence of factual issues surrounding a release. We disagree and affirm.
I. Background
In his pro se petition filed May 15, 1992, passenger alleged he was injured on April 17, 1987, when the bus he was riding collided with two other vehicles. Bus company’s answer raised release as an affirmative defense. The release was allegedly signed May 24, 1991.
Bus company then moved to dismiss the action, or alternatively…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claybon v. Midwest Petroleum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Carpenter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Cervantes v. BuhayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twehous Excavating Co. v. L.L. Lewis Investments, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Twehous Excavating v. LL LEWISMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009