Commonwealth v. Walsh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, P.J.:
Appellant, Thomas A. Walsh, appeals pro se from the order entered in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his motion for DNA testing pursuant to Section 9543.1 of the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 1 We affirm.
The relevant facts of this case are as follows. On October 9, 2003, Appellant was released from prison on parole following his convictions for terroristic threats and harassment against his wife, Dinah Walsh (“Victim”). A condition of Appellant’s sentence prohibited Appellant from having contact with Victim. Additionally, on the date of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KuncoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Rowe, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Hardy, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Alvin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Ballard, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.