Commonwealth v. Kunco
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting the motion of Appellee, John Kunco, for post-conviction DNA testing in this sexual assault case pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543.1. The Commonwealth argues that the evidence in support of Appel-lee’s motion does not present a prima facie case of actual innocence. We affirm.
The evidence presented during Appel-lee’s trial was as follows. On December 16, 1990, at approximately 5:00. a.m., Donna Seaman — who was blind in her right eye, farsighted in her left eye, and not wearing glasses — awoke to. find a man, whose face she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ConwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Tyler, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Tyler, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Bitting, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.