Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kunco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 2017No. 395 WDA 2017PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

The Commonwealth appeals from an order granting the motion of Appellee, John Kunco, for post-conviction DNA testing in this sexual assault case pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543.1. The Commonwealth argues that the evidence in support of Appel-lee’s motion does not present a prima facie case of actual innocence. We affirm.

The evidence presented during Appel-lee’s trial was as follows. On December 16, 1990, at approximately 5:00. a.m., Donna Seaman — who was blind in her right eye, farsighted in her left eye, and not wearing glasses — awoke to. find a man, whose face she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. ConwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Tyler, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Tyler, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Com. v. Bitting, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API