Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Allison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2002No. 71302-2PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Three defendants who were charged with driving while intoxicated challenged the admission of BAC Verifier DataMaster II (DataMaster) breath-alcohol test results. The Seattle Municipal Court suppressed the breath test results in all three cases, holding that the information recorded on the breath test documents was insufficient to determine whether there was compliance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) regulations. We hold that the breath test documents in these cases constitute prima facie evidence that the City of Seattle complied with former WAC 448-13-040 (1999) and thus satisfied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Overlake Hospital Ass'n v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API